| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Cache busting has caused serious problems for users in the past, here are two
examples:
- https://github.com/searxng/searxng/issues/4419
- https://github.com/searxng/searxng/issues/4481
And it makes development and deployment significantly more complex because it
binds the client side to the server side:
- https://github.com/searxng/searxng/pull/4466
In the light of a decoupled development of the WEB clients from the server side:
- https://github.com/searxng/searxng/pull/4988
is it appropriate to abandon this feature. In fact, it has been ineffective
since #4436 anyway.
However, the benefit has always been questionable, since at best only a few kB
of data are saved (at least in the context of an image_proxy, the effect is below
the detection limit). Ultimately, the client is responsible for caching.
Related: https://github.com/searxng/searxng/issues?q=label%3A%22clear%20browser%20cache%22
Closes: https://github.com/searxng/searxng/pull/4466
Closes: https://github.com/searxng/searxng/issues/1326
Closes: https://github.com/searxng/searxng/issues/964
Signed-off-by: Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@darmarit.de>
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@darmarit.de>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@darmarit.de>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@darmarit.de>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@darmarit.de>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@darmarit.de>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@darmarit.de>
|
|
Herein we add some hints and suggestions about typical architectures of
searx infrastructures. We start with a contribution from @dalf
- https://github.com/asciimoo/searx/pull/1776#issuecomment-567917320
thanks @dalf !!
Signed-off-by: Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@darmarit.de>
|